[Accessibility-testing] Notes & minutes of the April 30, 2018 meeting

[deborah.kaplan at suberic.net]

I'm comfortable constraining the first round of testing. If Zarf says
that it would double the work, that seems like a good reason to put
another constraint on what we are testing in the first pass. Maybe the
second pass can include ZCode and Choice of Games.

Deborah

On Tue, 1 May 2018, Zachary Kline wrote:

> I most definitely use iOS frotz for both ZCode and Glulx games. I’m not in any position to say whether we should include ZCode support in the first round, though. :)
>
> Best,
> Zack.
>> On May 1, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Andrew Plotkin <erkyrath at eblong.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, 1 May 2018, Jason McIntosh wrote:
>> 
>>> Zack (IIRC) brought up Filfre and Frotz as well, last night. It looks at a glance like Frotz is actively maintained (by David Kinder et al), but Z-code only — would that fit our pattern?
>> 
>> I have assumed that we will only write and test Glulx. Adding Z-code would basically double the work load for the parser part of the project. Do we want to go there?