[Accessibility-testing] Testing website online

[Furkle Industries]

Passwords seem like an additional potential failure point for an audience
(VI testers) you can't adequately test against. I think in general the less
business logic we put between testers and what they need to read the
better. We're not doing skunk works and the worst case I can imagine from
having the test be publicly visible (excluding Zarf's concerns) is that we
get too many testers. (Which I think we can agree is not a very significant
problem.)

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 11:28 AM Andrew Plotkin <erkyrath at eblong.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Jason McIntosh wrote:
>
> > Should we place this survey site behind a trivial username / password
> > challenge (which we’ll share with all testers), or just keep things
> > simple and leave it public (but not publicly linked)?
>
> I'd say "Simple," except that the web site promises an Amazon gift card.
>
> I think, just delete those two sentences from the web site -- anybody who
> comes in through PP will know about the gift thing.
>
> --Z
>
> --
> "And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the
> borogoves..."
> *_______________________________________________
> Accessibility-testing mailing list
> Accessibility-testing at iftechfoundation.org
> https://iftechfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-testing
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://iftechfoundation.org/pipermail/accessibility-testing/attachments/20181223/9b8cca8f/attachment.html>