[Accessibility-testing] Defining our list of a11y tests

[Jason McIntosh]

Thanks y’all!

Please read this as my own “I’m still alive” message - I moved house last week+weekend (hello from Providence), and am digging my way up through the inevitable pile of knock-on and catch-up activity. I am psyched to dive into the next steps here, so do expect me to follow up in full presently. :)

> On Mar 19, 2018, at 4:48 PM, furkle at furkleindustries.com wrote:
> 
> Sounds good to me as well! Definitely lets me contribute more I actually
> know about (Twine) rather than things I do not (parser).
> 
> Thanks,
> Claire (furkle)
> 
>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Jason McIntosh wrote:
>> 
>>> More on how my thoughts here run: I would propose that we form
>>> sub-groups who would each create a small testing game for one of the IF
>>> platforms we’d like to test. (I7, Twine 1/2, ChoiceScript). It would
>>> be up to each such group to have their test-game exercise as much of
>>> WCAG level A as they can, with a focus on IF-specific challenges. (So:
>>> ASCII art in a parser game, cycle-links in a Twine game, et cetera.)
>> 
>> This sounds right to me.
>> 
>> --Z
>> 
>> --
>> "And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the
>> borogoves..."
>> *_______________________________________________
>> Accessibility-testing mailing list
>> Accessibility-testing at iftechfoundation.org
>> http://iftechfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-testing
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accessibility-testing mailing list
> Accessibility-testing at iftechfoundation.org
> http://iftechfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-testing